Institution record
Bank of The Ryukyus
Bank of The Ryukyus, Limited
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Bank of The Ryukyus against peer institutions in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bank of The Ryukyus (this record) | FSA | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Okcoin | FinCENFINTRACFinCEN+3 | 3 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Mizuho Securities | FSAFCABaFin+4 | 6 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| ThinkMarkets | FSCAFCAASIC+3 | 4 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | — | 1 |
| PayPay Securities | FSA | 0 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Forex | FSANFAFCA+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 1 |
Bank of The Ryukyus: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Bank of The Ryukyus's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, Bank of The Ryukyus (legal entity reference: Bank of The Ryukyus, Limited) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: FSA (Financial Services Agency) — licence 6360001000404, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FSA public register.
Which of Bank of The Ryukyus's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
Bank of The Ryukyus is registered at Bank of The Ryukyus 1-2-3 Kumoji, Naha City, Okinawa 900-8671, Japan and tracked under our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints scope based on its institutional service profile (Wealth management, Investment products, Deposits, Remittances, Loans, Trusts, Insurance) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (FSA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is Bank of The Ryukyus's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Bank of The Ryukyus carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Bank of The Ryukyus's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Bank of The Ryukyus, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FSA.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from RegTech Codex relevant to Bank of The Ryukyus's supervisory scope.
RegTech & Prudential Compliance
European Financial Regulatory Architecture in 2026: DORA ICT Operational Resilience, MiCA CASP Prudential Supervision, and EU AMLA Direct Oversight
A comprehensive statutory compliance briefing analyzing Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA) ICT incident reporting and TLPT mandates, Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (MiCA) Class 1-3 CASP and EMT/ART reserve rules, Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 Travel Rule, and Frankfurt AMLA direct supervision.
Regulatory Compliance & Licensing
FATF Travel Rule (Recommendation 16) Cross-Border VASP Compliance, EU AMLR/AMLA Supervision & FCA/MAS Client Asset Segregation Audits: 2026 Codex
Cross-border Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) compliance refers to the synchronized execution of cryptographic wire-transfer messaging under FATF Recommendation 16, direct supranational AML supervision under EU Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 (AMLR) and Regulation (EU) 2024/1113 (TFR), and statutory daily client asset segregation reconciliations mandated by the UK FCA CASS 7/CASS 15 and MAS PSN02/CMSA frameworks.
EU MiCA & DORA Compliance
EU DORA & MiCA Compliance Rules: ICT Incident Reporting, CTPP Oversight & CASP Licensing (2026)
The EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) mandates major ICT incident reporting within 4 hours (Source: Regulation EU 2022/2554, 2025-01-17) and full MiCA CASP authorization by July 1, 2026 (Source: ESMA, 2026-07-01).
EU MiCA & DORA Compliance
EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA: Statutory Capital Floors, Prudential Ratios & Licensing Thresholds (4 Hours Major ICT Incident Alert Benchmark)
EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA (EU-DORA-2022-2554) stands at 4 Hours (Major ICT Incident Alert) (Source: ESMA / EBA / EIOPA Joint RTS, 2026-10-20), governing initial permanent