Skip to content
RegTech CodexGlobal Financial Compliance, AML/KYC Frameworks & Prudential Rulebooks

Institution record

bitkub

Risk level not supplied1 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
SECTier-2
Securities and Exchange Commission, Thailand
Not suppliedRegulatedBitkub Online Co.,Ltd.—

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing bitkub against peer institutions in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
bitkub (this record)
SEC
1 / 1Risk level not supplied—0
Okcoin
FinCENFINTRACFinCEN+3
3 / 6Risk level not supplied—0
OKCoin Japan
FinCENFINTRACFinCEN+2
2 / 5Risk level not supplied—0
UEEx
FinCENFINTRACFinCEN
0 / 3Risk level not supplied—0
CANADA
FINTRACFinCENASIC+8
3 / 11Risk level not supplied—0
Alpari International
CBRFSCNBRB+1
2 / 4Risk level not supplied—0

bitkub: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is bitkub's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, bitkub (legal entity reference: bitkub) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission, Thailand) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated, Tier-2. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official SEC public register.

Which of bitkub's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

bitkub is tracked under our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (SEC) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is bitkub's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

bitkub carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to bitkub's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with bitkub, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to SEC.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from RegTech Codex relevant to bitkub's supervisory scope.

All research →

Global Enforcement & Licensing Rules

Global Regulatory Enforcement 2026: SEC Recordkeeping Fines, FCA Consumer Duty & ASIC/MAS Finfluencer Rules

SEC off-channel communications sweeps totaled $2.3 billion across 95 actions (Source: SEC, 2026-04-15), while 17 regulators led by the UK FCA executed a coordinated finfluencer crackdown in April 2026 (Source: FCA, 2026-04-20).

Read briefing →

Prudential Capital & Client Money Segregation

UK FCA Consumer Duty (PRIN 2A) & Section 21 Financial Promotions Gateway: Statutory Capital Floors, Prudential Ratios & Licensing Thresholds (2 Years Max s21 Statutory Penalty Benchmark)

UK FCA Consumer Duty (PRIN 2A) & Section 21 Financial Promotions Gateway (FCA-CONSUMER-DUTY) stands at 2 Years (Max s21 Statutory Penalty) (Source: UK Financial Conduct Authority, 2026-10-20), governing initial permanent

Read briefing →

Clone Firm Detection & Register Audits

UK FCA Consumer Duty (PRIN 2A) & Section 21 Financial Promotions Gateway: Supervisory Reporting Timelines, Technical Standards & Audit Trails (2 Years Max s21 Statutory Penalty Benchmark)

UK FCA Consumer Duty (PRIN 2A) & Section 21 Financial Promotions Gateway (FCA-CONSUMER-DUTY) stands at 2 Years (Max s21 Statutory Penalty) (Source: UK Financial Conduct Authority, 2026-10-20), governing 4-hour/24-hour/72

Read briefing →

EU MiCA & DORA Compliance

UK FCA Consumer Duty (PRIN 2A) & Section 21 Financial Promotions Gateway: Enforcement Penalties, Sanction Ceilings & Self-Reporting Mitigation (2 Years Max s21 Statutory Penalty Benchmark)

UK FCA Consumer Duty (PRIN 2A) & Section 21 Financial Promotions Gateway (FCA-CONSUMER-DUTY) stands at 2 Years (Max s21 Statutory Penalty) (Source: UK Financial Conduct Authority, 2026-10-20), governing recent enforcemen

Read briefing →
bitkub — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | RegTech Codex