Skip to content
RegTech CodexGlobal Financial Compliance, AML/KYC Frameworks & Prudential Rulebooks

Institution record

BitMart

Risk level not supplied1 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
FinCENTier-1
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)
31000184636226RegulatedSpread Technologies LLC2021-03-08

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing BitMart against peer institutions in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
BitMart (this record)
FinCEN
1 / 1Risk level not supplied—0
Okcoin
FinCENFINTRACFinCEN+3
3 / 6Risk level not supplied—0
OKCoin Japan
FinCENFINTRACFinCEN+2
2 / 5Risk level not supplied—0
UEEx
FinCENFINTRACFinCEN
0 / 3Risk level not supplied—0
CANADA
FINTRACFinCENASIC+8
3 / 11Risk level not supplied—0
CoinZoom
BMAFinCENSEC+1
2 / 4Risk level not supplied—0

BitMart: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is BitMart's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, BitMart (legal entity reference: BitMart) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)) — licence 31000184636226, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FinCEN public register.

Which of BitMart's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

BitMart is tracked under our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (FinCEN) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is BitMart's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

BitMart carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to BitMart's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with BitMart, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FinCEN.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from RegTech Codex relevant to BitMart's supervisory scope.

All research →

RegTech & Prudential Compliance

European Financial Regulatory Architecture in 2026: DORA ICT Operational Resilience, MiCA CASP Prudential Supervision, and EU AMLA Direct Oversight

A comprehensive statutory compliance briefing analyzing Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA) ICT incident reporting and TLPT mandates, Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (MiCA) Class 1-3 CASP and EMT/ART reserve rules, Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 Travel Rule, and Frankfurt AMLA direct supervision.

Read briefing →

Regulatory Compliance & Licensing

FATF Travel Rule (Recommendation 16) Cross-Border VASP Compliance, EU AMLR/AMLA Supervision & FCA/MAS Client Asset Segregation Audits: 2026 Codex

Cross-border Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) compliance refers to the synchronized execution of cryptographic wire-transfer messaging under FATF Recommendation 16, direct supranational AML supervision under EU Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 (AMLR) and Regulation (EU) 2024/1113 (TFR), and statutory daily client asset segregation reconciliations mandated by the UK FCA CASS 7/CASS 15 and MAS PSN02/CMSA frameworks.

Read briefing →

EU MiCA & DORA Compliance

EU DORA & MiCA Compliance Rules: ICT Incident Reporting, CTPP Oversight & CASP Licensing (2026)

The EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) mandates major ICT incident reporting within 4 hours (Source: Regulation EU 2022/2554, 2025-01-17) and full MiCA CASP authorization by July 1, 2026 (Source: ESMA, 2026-07-01).

Read briefing →

EU MiCA & DORA Compliance

EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA: Statutory Capital Floors, Prudential Ratios & Licensing Thresholds (4 Hours Major ICT Incident Alert Benchmark)

EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA (EU-DORA-2022-2554) stands at 4 Hours (Major ICT Incident Alert) (Source: ESMA / EBA / EIOPA Joint RTS, 2026-10-20), governing initial permanent

Read briefing →
BitMart — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | RegTech Codex