Skip to content
RegTech CodexGlobal Financial Compliance, AML/KYC Frameworks & Prudential Rulebooks

Institution record

Bitpanda

Bitpanda GmbH

Risk level not supplied4 of 4 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
AMFTier-1
Autorité des marchés financiers
Number pending checkRegulatedBitpanda GmbH2025-4-14
CONSOBTier-1
Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa
Number pending checkRegulatedBitpanda—
FITier-1
Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority
Number pending checkRegulatedBitpanda—
BaFinTier-1
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht
Number pending checkRegulatedBitpanda—

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Bitpanda against peer institutions in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
Bitpanda (this record)
AMFCONSOBFI+1
4 / 4Risk level not supplied—0
Mizuho Securities
FSAFCABaFin+4
6 / 7Risk level not supplied—0
Admiral Markets
BaFinFSAEFSA+3
4 / 6Risk level not supplied—0
CMCMarkets
BaFinFCAFMA+3
5 / 6Risk level not supplied—0
Pepperstone
BaFinCYSECSCB+3
4 / 6Risk level not supplied—0
FXFlat
BaFin
0 / 1Risk level not supplied—0

Bitpanda: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is Bitpanda's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, Bitpanda (legal entity reference: Bitpanda GmbH) holds 4 recorded licence entries, of which 4 carry a "regulated" status and 4 are marked regulated or registered: AMF (Autorité des marchés financiers) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-1; CONSOB (Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-1; FI (Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-1; BaFin (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official AMF, CONSOB, FI public register.

Which of Bitpanda's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

Bitpanda is tracked under our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 4 recorded licences (AMF, CONSOB, FI, BaFin) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is Bitpanda's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

Bitpanda carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to Bitpanda's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with Bitpanda, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (bitpanda.com/fr) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to AMF.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from RegTech Codex relevant to Bitpanda's supervisory scope.

All research →

RegTech & Prudential Compliance

European Financial Regulatory Architecture in 2026: DORA ICT Operational Resilience, MiCA CASP Prudential Supervision, and EU AMLA Direct Oversight

A comprehensive statutory compliance briefing analyzing Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA) ICT incident reporting and TLPT mandates, Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (MiCA) Class 1-3 CASP and EMT/ART reserve rules, Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 Travel Rule, and Frankfurt AMLA direct supervision.

Read briefing →

Clone Firm Detection & Register Audits

EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA: Client Asset Segregation, Daily Reconciliation & Insolvency Protection (4 Hours Major ICT Incident Alert Benchmark)

EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA (EU-DORA-2022-2554) stands at 4 Hours (Major ICT Incident Alert) (Source: ESMA / EBA / EIOPA Joint RTS, 2026-10-20), governing statutory trust l

Read briefing →

Clone Firm Detection & Register Audits

EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA: Official Register Verification Workflow & Clone Firm Red Flags (4 Hours Major ICT Incident Alert Benchmark)

EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA (EU-DORA-2022-2554) stands at 4 Hours (Major ICT Incident Alert) (Source: ESMA / EBA / EIOPA Joint RTS, 2026-10-20), governing cross-checking FR

Read briefing →

Global Enforcement & Licensing Rules

Global Regulatory Enforcement 2026: SEC Recordkeeping Fines, FCA Consumer Duty & ASIC/MAS Finfluencer Rules

SEC off-channel communications sweeps totaled $2.3 billion across 95 actions (Source: SEC, 2026-04-15), while 17 regulators led by the UK FCA executed a coordinated finfluencer crackdown in April 2026 (Source: FCA, 2026-04-20).

Read briefing →
Bitpanda — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | RegTech Codex