Skip to content
RegTech CodexGlobal Financial Compliance, AML/KYC Frameworks & Prudential Rulebooks

Institution record

Danske Bank

Risk level not supplied1 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
DKFSATier-1
Danish Financial Supervisory Authority
61126228RegulatedDanske Bank A/S2020-12-01

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Danske Bank against peer institutions in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
Danske Bank (this record)
DKFSA
1 / 1Risk level not supplied—0
Okcoin
FinCENFINTRACFinCEN+3
3 / 6Risk level not supplied—0
OKCoin Japan
FinCENFINTRACFinCEN+2
2 / 5Risk level not supplied—0
UEEx
FinCENFINTRACFinCEN
0 / 3Risk level not supplied—0
CANADA
FINTRACFinCENASIC+8
3 / 11Risk level not supplied—0
Alpari International
CBRFSCNBRB+1
2 / 4Risk level not supplied—0

Danske Bank: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is Danske Bank's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, Danske Bank (legal entity reference: Danske Bank) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: DKFSA (Danish Financial Supervisory Authority) — licence 61126228, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official DKFSA public register.

Which of Danske Bank's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

Danske Bank is registered at Holmens Kanal 2-12, DK-1092 Copenhagen K, Denmark and tracked under our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints scope based on its institutional service profile (Investment, Insurance, Banking, Financial services) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (DKFSA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is Danske Bank's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

Danske Bank carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to Danske Bank's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with Danske Bank, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to DKFSA.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from RegTech Codex relevant to Danske Bank's supervisory scope.

All research →

EU MiCA & DORA Compliance

Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability: Statutory Capital Floors, Prudential Ratios & Licensing Thresholds (5 Years Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty Benchmark)

Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability (ASIC-AFSL-INFO269) stands at 5 Years (Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty) (Source: Australian Securities & Investments Commission, 2026-10-20), governi

Read briefing →

Global Enforcement & Licensing Rules

Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability: Supervisory Reporting Timelines, Technical Standards & Audit Trails (5 Years Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty Benchmark)

Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability (ASIC-AFSL-INFO269) stands at 5 Years (Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty) (Source: Australian Securities & Investments Commission, 2026-10-20), governi

Read briefing →

Prudential Capital & Client Money Segregation

Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability: Enforcement Penalties, Sanction Ceilings & Self-Reporting Mitigation (5 Years Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty Benchmark)

Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability (ASIC-AFSL-INFO269) stands at 5 Years (Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty) (Source: Australian Securities & Investments Commission, 2026-10-20), governi

Read briefing →

Clone Firm Detection & Register Audits

Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability: Client Asset Segregation, Daily Reconciliation & Insolvency Protection (5 Years Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty Benchmark)

Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability (ASIC-AFSL-INFO269) stands at 5 Years (Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty) (Source: Australian Securities & Investments Commission, 2026-10-20), governi

Read briefing →
Danske Bank — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | RegTech Codex