Skip to content
RegTech CodexGlobal Financial Compliance, AML/KYC Frameworks & Prudential Rulebooks

Institution record

Naito Securities

Risk level not supplied1 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
FSATier-1
Financial Services Agency
7120001077507Regulated—2007-09-30

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Naito Securities against peer institutions in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
Naito Securities (this record)
FSA
1 / 1Risk level not supplied—0
Okcoin
FinCENFINTRACFinCEN+3
3 / 6Risk level not supplied—0
Mizuho Securities
FSAFCABaFin+4
6 / 7Risk level not supplied—0
ThinkMarkets
FSCAFCAASIC+3
4 / 6Risk level not supplied—1
PayPay Securities
FSA
0 / 1Risk level not supplied—0
Forex
FSANFAFCA+2
5 / 5Risk level not supplied—1

Naito Securities: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is Naito Securities's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, Naito Securities (legal entity reference: Naito Securities) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: FSA (Financial Services Agency) — licence 7120001077507, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FSA public register.

Which of Naito Securities's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

Naito Securities is tracked under our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (FSA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is Naito Securities's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

Naito Securities carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to Naito Securities's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with Naito Securities, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FSA.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from RegTech Codex relevant to Naito Securities's supervisory scope.

All research →

RegTech & Prudential Compliance

European Financial Regulatory Architecture in 2026: DORA ICT Operational Resilience, MiCA CASP Prudential Supervision, and EU AMLA Direct Oversight

A comprehensive statutory compliance briefing analyzing Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA) ICT incident reporting and TLPT mandates, Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (MiCA) Class 1-3 CASP and EMT/ART reserve rules, Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 Travel Rule, and Frankfurt AMLA direct supervision.

Read briefing →

Regulatory Compliance & Licensing

FATF Travel Rule (Recommendation 16) Cross-Border VASP Compliance, EU AMLR/AMLA Supervision & FCA/MAS Client Asset Segregation Audits: 2026 Codex

Cross-border Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) compliance refers to the synchronized execution of cryptographic wire-transfer messaging under FATF Recommendation 16, direct supranational AML supervision under EU Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 (AMLR) and Regulation (EU) 2024/1113 (TFR), and statutory daily client asset segregation reconciliations mandated by the UK FCA CASS 7/CASS 15 and MAS PSN02/CMSA frameworks.

Read briefing →

EU MiCA & DORA Compliance

EU DORA & MiCA Compliance Rules: ICT Incident Reporting, CTPP Oversight & CASP Licensing (2026)

The EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) mandates major ICT incident reporting within 4 hours (Source: Regulation EU 2022/2554, 2025-01-17) and full MiCA CASP authorization by July 1, 2026 (Source: ESMA, 2026-07-01).

Read briefing →

EU MiCA & DORA Compliance

EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA: Statutory Capital Floors, Prudential Ratios & Licensing Thresholds (4 Hours Major ICT Incident Alert Benchmark)

EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA (EU-DORA-2022-2554) stands at 4 Hours (Major ICT Incident Alert) (Source: ESMA / EBA / EIOPA Joint RTS, 2026-10-20), governing initial permanent

Read briefing →
Naito Securities — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | RegTech Codex