Skip to content
RegTech CodexGlobal Financial Compliance, AML/KYC Frameworks & Prudential Rulebooks

Institution record

Exfor

Exfor Limited

Risk level not supplied1 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
LabuanOffshore
Labuan Financial Services Authority
MB/22 / 0099RegulatedExfor Limited—

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Exfor against peer institutions in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
Exfor (this record)
Labuan
1 / 1Risk level not supplied—0
ICM
FCALabuanFSRA+1
3 / 4Risk level not supplied—0
MARKET
LabuanVFSC
1 / 2Risk level not supplied—0
Pacific
Labuan
1 / 1Risk level not supplied—1
uTrada
Labuan
1 / 1Risk level not supplied—1
Okcoin
FinCENFINTRACFinCEN+3
3 / 6Risk level not supplied—0

Exfor: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is Exfor's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, Exfor (legal entity reference: Exfor Limited) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: Labuan (Labuan Financial Services Authority) — licence MB/22 / 0099, status: regulated, Offshore. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official Labuan public register.

Which of Exfor's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

Exfor is registered at Office Suite 1629, Level 16 (A), Main Office Tower, Financial Park Complex, Jalan Merdeka, 87000 Labuan F.T. and tracked under our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (Labuan) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is Exfor's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

Exfor carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to Exfor's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with Exfor, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to Labuan.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from RegTech Codex relevant to Exfor's supervisory scope.

All research →

RegTech & Prudential Compliance

European Financial Regulatory Architecture in 2026: DORA ICT Operational Resilience, MiCA CASP Prudential Supervision, and EU AMLA Direct Oversight

A comprehensive statutory compliance briefing analyzing Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA) ICT incident reporting and TLPT mandates, Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (MiCA) Class 1-3 CASP and EMT/ART reserve rules, Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 Travel Rule, and Frankfurt AMLA direct supervision.

Read briefing →

Regulatory Compliance & Licensing

FATF Travel Rule (Recommendation 16) Cross-Border VASP Compliance, EU AMLR/AMLA Supervision & FCA/MAS Client Asset Segregation Audits: 2026 Codex

Cross-border Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) compliance refers to the synchronized execution of cryptographic wire-transfer messaging under FATF Recommendation 16, direct supranational AML supervision under EU Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 (AMLR) and Regulation (EU) 2024/1113 (TFR), and statutory daily client asset segregation reconciliations mandated by the UK FCA CASS 7/CASS 15 and MAS PSN02/CMSA frameworks.

Read briefing →

EU MiCA & DORA Compliance

EU DORA & MiCA Compliance Rules: ICT Incident Reporting, CTPP Oversight & CASP Licensing (2026)

The EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) mandates major ICT incident reporting within 4 hours (Source: Regulation EU 2022/2554, 2025-01-17) and full MiCA CASP authorization by July 1, 2026 (Source: ESMA, 2026-07-01).

Read briefing →

EU MiCA & DORA Compliance

EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA: Statutory Capital Floors, Prudential Ratios & Licensing Thresholds (4 Hours Major ICT Incident Alert Benchmark)

EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA (EU-DORA-2022-2554) stands at 4 Hours (Major ICT Incident Alert) (Source: ESMA / EBA / EIOPA Joint RTS, 2026-10-20), governing initial permanent

Read briefing →
Exfor — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | RegTech Codex