Institution record
ING BANK
ING Group
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing ING BANK against peer institutions in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ING BANK (this record) | DNBECBPRA | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Mizuho Securities | FSAFCABaFin+4 | 6 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Okcoin | FinCENFINTRACFinCEN+3 | 3 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| OKCoin Japan | FinCENFINTRACFinCEN+2 | 2 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| UEEx | FinCENFINTRACFinCEN | 0 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| CANADA | FINTRACFinCENASIC+8 | 3 / 11 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
ING BANK: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is ING BANK's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, ING BANK (legal entity reference: ING Group) holds 3 recorded licence entries, of which 3 carry a "regulated" status and 3 are marked regulated or registered: DNB (De Nederlandsche Bank) — licence B0163, status: regulated, Tier-1; ECB (European Central Bank) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-1; PRA (Prudential Regulation Authority (UK)) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official DNB, ECB, PRA public register.
Which of ING BANK's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
ING BANK is tracked under our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Investment, Loans, Insurance) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 3 recorded licences (DNB, ECB, PRA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is ING BANK's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
ING BANK carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to ING BANK's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with ING BANK, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to DNB.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from RegTech Codex relevant to ING BANK's supervisory scope.
Regulatory Compliance & Licensing
FATF Travel Rule (Recommendation 16) Cross-Border VASP Compliance, EU AMLR/AMLA Supervision & FCA/MAS Client Asset Segregation Audits: 2026 Codex
Cross-border Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) compliance refers to the synchronized execution of cryptographic wire-transfer messaging under FATF Recommendation 16, direct supranational AML supervision under EU Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 (AMLR) and Regulation (EU) 2024/1113 (TFR), and statutory daily client asset segregation reconciliations mandated by the UK FCA CASS 7/CASS 15 and MAS PSN02/CMSA frameworks.
EU MiCA & DORA Compliance
Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability: Statutory Capital Floors, Prudential Ratios & Licensing Thresholds (5 Years Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty Benchmark)
Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability (ASIC-AFSL-INFO269) stands at 5 Years (Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty) (Source: Australian Securities & Investments Commission, 2026-10-20), governi
Global Enforcement & Licensing Rules
Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability: Supervisory Reporting Timelines, Technical Standards & Audit Trails (5 Years Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty Benchmark)
Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability (ASIC-AFSL-INFO269) stands at 5 Years (Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty) (Source: Australian Securities & Investments Commission, 2026-10-20), governi
Prudential Capital & Client Money Segregation
Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability: Enforcement Penalties, Sanction Ceilings & Self-Reporting Mitigation (5 Years Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty Benchmark)
Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability (ASIC-AFSL-INFO269) stands at 5 Years (Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty) (Source: Australian Securities & Investments Commission, 2026-10-20), governi