Institution record
INVAST
INVAST Securities Co.,Ltd
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSATier-1 Financial Services Agency | Kanto Local Finance Bureau (FIBO) No. 26 | Regulated | — | 2007-09-30 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing INVAST against peer institutions in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INVAST (this record) | FSA | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Okcoin | FinCENFINTRACFinCEN+3 | 3 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Mizuho Securities | FSAFCABaFin+4 | 6 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| ThinkMarkets | FSCAFCAASIC+3 | 4 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | — | 1 |
| PayPay Securities | FSA | 0 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Forex | FSANFAFCA+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 1 |
INVAST: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is INVAST's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, INVAST (legal entity reference: INVAST Securities Co.,Ltd) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: FSA (Financial Services Agency) — licence Kanto Local Finance Bureau (FIBO) No. 26, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FSA public register.
Which of INVAST's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
INVAST is tracked under our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (FSA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is INVAST's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
INVAST carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to INVAST's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with INVAST, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (cn.invast.jp) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FSA.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from RegTech Codex relevant to INVAST's supervisory scope.
RegTech & Prudential Compliance
European Financial Regulatory Architecture in 2026: DORA ICT Operational Resilience, MiCA CASP Prudential Supervision, and EU AMLA Direct Oversight
A comprehensive statutory compliance briefing analyzing Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA) ICT incident reporting and TLPT mandates, Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (MiCA) Class 1-3 CASP and EMT/ART reserve rules, Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 Travel Rule, and Frankfurt AMLA direct supervision.
Regulatory Compliance & Licensing
FATF Travel Rule (Recommendation 16) Cross-Border VASP Compliance, EU AMLR/AMLA Supervision & FCA/MAS Client Asset Segregation Audits: 2026 Codex
Cross-border Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) compliance refers to the synchronized execution of cryptographic wire-transfer messaging under FATF Recommendation 16, direct supranational AML supervision under EU Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 (AMLR) and Regulation (EU) 2024/1113 (TFR), and statutory daily client asset segregation reconciliations mandated by the UK FCA CASS 7/CASS 15 and MAS PSN02/CMSA frameworks.
EU MiCA & DORA Compliance
EU DORA & MiCA Compliance Rules: ICT Incident Reporting, CTPP Oversight & CASP Licensing (2026)
The EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) mandates major ICT incident reporting within 4 hours (Source: Regulation EU 2022/2554, 2025-01-17) and full MiCA CASP authorization by July 1, 2026 (Source: ESMA, 2026-07-01).
EU MiCA & DORA Compliance
EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA: Statutory Capital Floors, Prudential Ratios & Licensing Thresholds (4 Hours Major ICT Incident Alert Benchmark)
EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA (EU-DORA-2022-2554) stands at 4 Hours (Major ICT Incident Alert) (Source: ESMA / EBA / EIOPA Joint RTS, 2026-10-20), governing initial permanent