Skip to content
RegTech CodexGlobal Financial Compliance, AML/KYC Frameworks & Prudential Rulebooks

Institution record

OnFin

OnFin Ltd

Risk level not supplied1 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
MISAOffshore
MWALI INTERNATIONAL SERVICES AUTHORITY
BFX2024038RegulatedOnFin Ltd2024-03-13

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing OnFin against peer institutions in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
OnFin (this record)
MISA
1 / 1Risk level not supplied—0
Alpari International
CBRFSCNBRB+1
2 / 4Risk level not supplied—0
Viverno
MISAFSAFSC+2
4 / 5Risk level not supplied—1
LDN
MISA
0 / 1Risk level not supplied—1
Swift
MISA
0 / 1Risk level not supplied—1
Zarvista
MISA
1 / 1Risk level not supplied—1

OnFin: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is OnFin's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, OnFin (legal entity reference: OnFin Ltd) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: MISA (MWALI INTERNATIONAL SERVICES AUTHORITY) — licence BFX2024038, status: regulated, Offshore. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official MISA public register.

Which of OnFin's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

OnFin is registered at Moheli Corporate Services LTD P.B. 1257 Bonovo Road, Fomboni, Comoros, KM and tracked under our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (MISA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is OnFin's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

OnFin carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to OnFin's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with OnFin, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (onfin.io) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to MISA.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from RegTech Codex relevant to OnFin's supervisory scope.

All research →

RegTech & Prudential Compliance

European Financial Regulatory Architecture in 2026: DORA ICT Operational Resilience, MiCA CASP Prudential Supervision, and EU AMLA Direct Oversight

A comprehensive statutory compliance briefing analyzing Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA) ICT incident reporting and TLPT mandates, Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (MiCA) Class 1-3 CASP and EMT/ART reserve rules, Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 Travel Rule, and Frankfurt AMLA direct supervision.

Read briefing →

Regulatory Compliance & Licensing

FATF Travel Rule (Recommendation 16) Cross-Border VASP Compliance, EU AMLR/AMLA Supervision & FCA/MAS Client Asset Segregation Audits: 2026 Codex

Cross-border Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) compliance refers to the synchronized execution of cryptographic wire-transfer messaging under FATF Recommendation 16, direct supranational AML supervision under EU Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 (AMLR) and Regulation (EU) 2024/1113 (TFR), and statutory daily client asset segregation reconciliations mandated by the UK FCA CASS 7/CASS 15 and MAS PSN02/CMSA frameworks.

Read briefing →

EU MiCA & DORA Compliance

EU DORA & MiCA Compliance Rules: ICT Incident Reporting, CTPP Oversight & CASP Licensing (2026)

The EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) mandates major ICT incident reporting within 4 hours (Source: Regulation EU 2022/2554, 2025-01-17) and full MiCA CASP authorization by July 1, 2026 (Source: ESMA, 2026-07-01).

Read briefing →

EU MiCA & DORA Compliance

EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA: Statutory Capital Floors, Prudential Ratios & Licensing Thresholds (4 Hours Major ICT Incident Alert Benchmark)

EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA (EU-DORA-2022-2554) stands at 4 Hours (Major ICT Incident Alert) (Source: ESMA / EBA / EIOPA Joint RTS, 2026-10-20), governing initial permanent

Read briefing →
OnFin — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | RegTech Codex