Institution record
PT. REKENINGKU DOTCOM INDONESIA
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing PT. REKENINGKU DOTCOM INDONESIA against peer institutions in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PT. REKENINGKU DOTCOM INDONESIA (this record) | BAPPEBTI | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| International | FCAMFSAASIC+2 | 4 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Dupoin | BAPPEBTIFCA | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | — | 2 |
| Octa | CYSECBAPPEBTI | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | — | 1 |
| Okcoin | FinCENFINTRACFinCEN+3 | 3 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| OKCoin Japan | FinCENFINTRACFinCEN+2 | 2 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
PT. REKENINGKU DOTCOM INDONESIA: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is PT. REKENINGKU DOTCOM INDONESIA's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, PT. REKENINGKU DOTCOM INDONESIA (legal entity reference: PT. REKENINGKU DOTCOM INDONESIA) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: BAPPEBTI (Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI)) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated, Tier-2. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official BAPPEBTI public register.
Which of PT. REKENINGKU DOTCOM INDONESIA's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
PT. REKENINGKU DOTCOM INDONESIA is tracked under our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (BAPPEBTI) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is PT. REKENINGKU DOTCOM INDONESIA's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
PT. REKENINGKU DOTCOM INDONESIA carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to PT. REKENINGKU DOTCOM INDONESIA's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with PT. REKENINGKU DOTCOM INDONESIA, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to BAPPEBTI.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from RegTech Codex relevant to PT. REKENINGKU DOTCOM INDONESIA's supervisory scope.
RegTech & Prudential Compliance
European Financial Regulatory Architecture in 2026: DORA ICT Operational Resilience, MiCA CASP Prudential Supervision, and EU AMLA Direct Oversight
A comprehensive statutory compliance briefing analyzing Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA) ICT incident reporting and TLPT mandates, Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (MiCA) Class 1-3 CASP and EMT/ART reserve rules, Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 Travel Rule, and Frankfurt AMLA direct supervision.
Regulatory Compliance & Licensing
FATF Travel Rule (Recommendation 16) Cross-Border VASP Compliance, EU AMLR/AMLA Supervision & FCA/MAS Client Asset Segregation Audits: 2026 Codex
Cross-border Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) compliance refers to the synchronized execution of cryptographic wire-transfer messaging under FATF Recommendation 16, direct supranational AML supervision under EU Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 (AMLR) and Regulation (EU) 2024/1113 (TFR), and statutory daily client asset segregation reconciliations mandated by the UK FCA CASS 7/CASS 15 and MAS PSN02/CMSA frameworks.
EU MiCA & DORA Compliance
EU DORA & MiCA Compliance Rules: ICT Incident Reporting, CTPP Oversight & CASP Licensing (2026)
The EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) mandates major ICT incident reporting within 4 hours (Source: Regulation EU 2022/2554, 2025-01-17) and full MiCA CASP authorization by July 1, 2026 (Source: ESMA, 2026-07-01).
EU MiCA & DORA Compliance
EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA: Statutory Capital Floors, Prudential Ratios & Licensing Thresholds (4 Hours Major ICT Incident Alert Benchmark)
EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA (EU-DORA-2022-2554) stands at 4 Hours (Major ICT Incident Alert) (Source: ESMA / EBA / EIOPA Joint RTS, 2026-10-20), governing initial permanent