Skip to content
RegTech CodexGlobal Financial Compliance, AML/KYC Frameworks & Prudential Rulebooks

Institution record

Tiger Brokers

UP Fintech Holding Ltd

Risk level not supplied4 of 4 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
SFCTier-1
Securities and Futures Commission
BMU940Regulated—2018-7-11
MASTier-1
Monetary Authority of Singapore
Number pending checkRegulatedTIGER BROKERS (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD—
FINRATier-1
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
18483RegulatedTRADEUP SECURITIES, INC.—
ASICTier-1
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
007268386RegulatedTIGER BROKERS (AU) PTY LIMITED1989-6-30

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Tiger Brokers against peer institutions in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
Tiger Brokers (this record)
SFCMASFINRA+1
4 / 4Risk level not supplied—0
CANADA
FINTRACFinCENASIC+8
3 / 11Risk level not supplied—0
Best Leader
ASICFSA
0 / 2Risk level not supplied—0
Mizuho Securities
FSAFCABaFin+4
6 / 7Risk level not supplied—0
Admiral Markets
BaFinFSAEFSA+3
4 / 6Risk level not supplied—0
CMCMarkets
BaFinFCAFMA+3
5 / 6Risk level not supplied—0

Tiger Brokers: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is Tiger Brokers's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, Tiger Brokers (legal entity reference: UP Fintech Holding Ltd) holds 4 recorded licence entries, of which 4 carry a "regulated" status and 4 are marked regulated or registered: SFC (Securities and Futures Commission) — licence BMU940, status: regulated, Tier-1; MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-1; FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) — licence 18483, status: regulated, Tier-1; ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) — licence 007268386, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official SFC, MAS, FINRA public register.

Which of Tiger Brokers's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

Tiger Brokers is tracked under our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Stocks, Wealth management, Asset management, Investment) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 4 recorded licences (SFC, MAS, FINRA, ASIC) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is Tiger Brokers's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

Tiger Brokers carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to Tiger Brokers's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with Tiger Brokers, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to SFC.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from RegTech Codex relevant to Tiger Brokers's supervisory scope.

All research →

EU MiCA & DORA Compliance

Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability: Statutory Capital Floors, Prudential Ratios & Licensing Thresholds (5 Years Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty Benchmark)

Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability (ASIC-AFSL-INFO269) stands at 5 Years (Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty) (Source: Australian Securities & Investments Commission, 2026-10-20), governi

Read briefing →

Global Enforcement & Licensing Rules

Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability: Supervisory Reporting Timelines, Technical Standards & Audit Trails (5 Years Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty Benchmark)

Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability (ASIC-AFSL-INFO269) stands at 5 Years (Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty) (Source: Australian Securities & Investments Commission, 2026-10-20), governi

Read briefing →

Prudential Capital & Client Money Segregation

Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability: Enforcement Penalties, Sanction Ceilings & Self-Reporting Mitigation (5 Years Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty Benchmark)

Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability (ASIC-AFSL-INFO269) stands at 5 Years (Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty) (Source: Australian Securities & Investments Commission, 2026-10-20), governi

Read briefing →

Clone Firm Detection & Register Audits

Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability: Client Asset Segregation, Daily Reconciliation & Insolvency Protection (5 Years Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty Benchmark)

Australia ASIC AFSL Supervision, RG 146 & INFO 269 Finfluencer Liability (ASIC-AFSL-INFO269) stands at 5 Years (Max Unlicensed Advice Penalty) (Source: Australian Securities & Investments Commission, 2026-10-20), governi

Read briefing →
Tiger Brokers — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | RegTech Codex