Institution record
Tradeview
Tradeview Markets
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LabuanOffshore Labuan Financial Services Authority | MB/19/0037 | Regulated | TVM Global Limited | — | |
FSCOffshore Financial Services Commission, Mauritius | GB20025800 | Regulated | iLC Brokers Ltd | 17/12/2020 | |
MFSATier-2 Malta Financial Services Authority | C 93990 | Regulated | TRADEVIEW EUROPE LIMITED | 06-01-2020 | |
CIMAOffshore Cayman Islands Monetary Authority | 585163 | Regulated | Tradeview Ltd. | 2012-04-04 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Tradeview against peer institutions in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradeview (this record) | LabuanFSCMFSA+1 | 4 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| International | FCAMFSAASIC+2 | 4 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Viverno | MISAFSAFSC+2 | 4 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 1 |
| ICM | FCALabuanFSRA+1 | 3 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| INFINOX | FCAFSCSCB | 2 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Exinity | FCAFSC | 1 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
Tradeview: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Tradeview's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, Tradeview (legal entity reference: Tradeview Markets) holds 4 recorded licence entries, of which 4 carry a "regulated" status and 4 are marked regulated or registered: Labuan (Labuan Financial Services Authority) — licence MB/19/0037, status: regulated, Offshore; FSC (Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) — licence GB20025800, status: regulated, Offshore; MFSA (Malta Financial Services Authority) — licence C 93990, status: regulated, Tier-2; CIMA (Cayman Islands Monetary Authority) — licence 585163, status: regulated, Offshore. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official Labuan, FSC, MFSA public register.
Which of Tradeview's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
Tradeview is registered at Grand Cayman, KY1-1002; 5th Floor Anderson Square, 64 Shedden Rd, PO Box 1105 and tracked under our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints scope based on its institutional service profile (Cryptocurrencies, CFDs, Indices, Forex, Commodities) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 4 recorded licences (Labuan, FSC, MFSA, CIMA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is Tradeview's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Tradeview carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Tradeview's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Tradeview, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (tradeview.eu) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to Labuan.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from RegTech Codex relevant to Tradeview's supervisory scope.
RegTech & Prudential Compliance
European Financial Regulatory Architecture in 2026: DORA ICT Operational Resilience, MiCA CASP Prudential Supervision, and EU AMLA Direct Oversight
A comprehensive statutory compliance briefing analyzing Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA) ICT incident reporting and TLPT mandates, Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (MiCA) Class 1-3 CASP and EMT/ART reserve rules, Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 Travel Rule, and Frankfurt AMLA direct supervision.
Regulatory Compliance & Licensing
FATF Travel Rule (Recommendation 16) Cross-Border VASP Compliance, EU AMLR/AMLA Supervision & FCA/MAS Client Asset Segregation Audits: 2026 Codex
Cross-border Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) compliance refers to the synchronized execution of cryptographic wire-transfer messaging under FATF Recommendation 16, direct supranational AML supervision under EU Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 (AMLR) and Regulation (EU) 2024/1113 (TFR), and statutory daily client asset segregation reconciliations mandated by the UK FCA CASS 7/CASS 15 and MAS PSN02/CMSA frameworks.
EU MiCA & DORA Compliance
EU DORA & MiCA Compliance Rules: ICT Incident Reporting, CTPP Oversight & CASP Licensing (2026)
The EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) mandates major ICT incident reporting within 4 hours (Source: Regulation EU 2022/2554, 2025-01-17) and full MiCA CASP authorization by July 1, 2026 (Source: ESMA, 2026-07-01).
EU MiCA & DORA Compliance
EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA: Statutory Capital Floors, Prudential Ratios & Licensing Thresholds (4 Hours Major ICT Incident Alert Benchmark)
EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) ICT Risk & 4-Hour Incident SLA (EU-DORA-2022-2554) stands at 4 Hours (Major ICT Incident Alert) (Source: ESMA / EBA / EIOPA Joint RTS, 2026-10-20), governing initial permanent
