XM

In our imported dataset, XM (legal entity reference: XM Global Limited) holds 5 recorded licence entries, of which 4 carry a "regulated" status and 4 are marked regulated or registered: DFSA (Dubai Financial Services Authority) — licence F003484, status: regulated, Tier-2; CYSEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) — licence 120/10, status: regulated, Tier-2; ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) — licence 000443670, status: regulated, Tier-1; FSC (Financial Services Commission) — licence 000261/397, status: offshore, Offshore; FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority) — licence 49976, status: regulated, Tier-2. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official DFSA, CYSEC, ASIC public register.

XM is registered at Coppergate House 10 Whites Row London E1 7NFE 1 7 N F UNITED KINGDOM No. 5 Cork Street, Belize City, Belize, CA. Suite 404, The Matalon, Coney Drive, Belize City, Belize and tracked under our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Forex, Stocks) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 5 recorded licences (DFSA, CYSEC, ASIC, FSC, FSCA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

XM carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

Before allocating capital or executing trades with XM (listed execution software: XM), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (trading-point.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to DFSA.