Institution record
Trilt
Trilt Limited
- Source score
- 1.5
- Source exposures
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In our coverage Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission | 254/14 | Revoked | Trilt Ltd | 2014-10-30 | |
In our coverage Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores | 4187 | Revoked | TRILT LTD | -- | |
In our coverage Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA) | 750779 | Revoked | TRILT LTD | 2016-06-23 | |
Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway | FT00096138 | Cancelled | Trilt Limited | 2016-06-23 |
Peer source record comparison
Compare imported fields for Trilt and other records in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints dataset. These are not independent audit findings.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Source exposures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trilt (this record) | CYSECCNMVFinancial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)+1 | 0 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 1.5 | 0 |
Financial Services Authority SeychellesCYSEC | 0 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 7.0 | 0 | |
Financial Conduct AuthorityFSCACYSEC | 1 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 | |
Financial Services CommissionCYSEC | 0 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.1 | 0 | |
NFACYSEC | 0 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
Financial Conduct AuthorityVFSCCYSEC | 1 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | 7.0 | 0 |
Trilt: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Trilt's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
The imported dataset contains 4 licence entries associated with Trilt (legal entity reference: Trilt Limited); 0 are labelled "regulated" and 0 are labelled regulated or registered: CYSEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) — licence 254/14, status: revoked; CNMV (Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores) — licence 4187, status: revoked; Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA) — licence 750779, status: revoked; FSA (Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway) — licence FT00096138, status: cancelled. These fields are not independent confirmation of current authorisation. Check the exact contracting entity and registration number on the official CYSEC, CNMV, Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA) public register.
Which of Trilt's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
This directory focuses on firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints. 3 of Trilt's 4 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: CYSEC (licence 254/14, revoked, entity: Trilt Ltd); CNMV (licence 4187, revoked, entity: TRILT LTD); Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA) (licence 750779, revoked, entity: TRILT LTD). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.
What is Trilt's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Trilt carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 1.5, risk & licensing: 1.5, brand: 1.5, market influence: 1.5, user reputation: 0.0). The imported source lists 0 exposure entries and 3 licence records with elevated status flags (CYSEC: revoked, CNMV: revoked, Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA): revoked). Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Trilt's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Trilt (listed execution software: MT4), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (trilt.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 source exposure entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to CYSEC.