Skip to content
RegTech Codex
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Abtrade vs MTrading: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Abtrade (Abtrade) and MTrading (ServiceComsvg LLC) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: abtrade-vs-mtrading

Abtrade outranks MTrading by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)

On supervisory breadth, Abtrade holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 2 warning count(s), whereas MTrading holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 1 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightAbtradeMTradingScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.02.0+3.0Abtrade
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.02.0+3.0Abtrade
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.01.0+2.0Abtrade
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.02.0+3.0Abtrade
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.02.0+3.0Abtrade

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Abtrade vs MTrading

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Abtrade vs MTrading
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Abtrade and MTrading.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeAbtradeMTrading
Primary Legal NameAbtradeServiceComsvg LLC
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on fileNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressOld Montrose box 12 Kingstown St.Vincent Kingstown VC, VC0100, Saint Vincent and the GrenadinesPO Box 2897, Euro House, Richmond Hill Road, Kingstown, Saint Vincent And The Grenadines, VC0100
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesMulti-asset financial servicesCryptocurrencies, CFDs, Currency pairs, Indices, Stocks, Commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishSpanish, Vietnamese, Indonesian, Malay, English, Russian, Thai
Warning / Exposure Count2 recorded warning(s)1 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Abtrade and MTrading against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Abtrade vs MTrading

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Abtrade or MTrading?

Both Abtrade and MTrading hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Abtrade maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 2 warning flag(s), whereas MTrading maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 1 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Abtrade and MTrading?

In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Abtrade records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with MTrading at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do Abtrade and MTrading differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Abtrade lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while MTrading lists Cryptocurrencies, CFDs, Currency pairs, Indices, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Abtrade or MTrading?

Abtrade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 2 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MTrading carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 1 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Abtrade vs MTrading (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | RegTech Codex