1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Acetop vs TeraFX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Acetop (Acetop Limited.) and TeraFX (Tera Europe Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints
TeraFX outranks Acetop by +0.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.5 vs 7.2)
On supervisory breadth, Acetop holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 3 warning count(s), whereas TeraFX holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 1 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Acetop | TeraFX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.2 | 7.5 | +0.3 | TeraFX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | Acetop |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.3 | 7.9 | +0.6 | TeraFX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 6.0 | +4.0 | TeraFX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Acetop vs TeraFX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Acetop | TeraFX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Acetop Limited. | Tera Europe Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1st Floor, 13 St. Swithins Lane, London EC4N 8AL | Office 701, One Canada Square Canary Wharf, London, E14 5AA UK Unit GA-00-SZ-L1-RT-201, Level 1, Gate Avenue - South Zone, DIFC, Dubai, UAEPL |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Precious metals, spread betting, contract spreads | CFDs, Indices, Forex, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese (Simplified), Spanish, Arabic, English, Russian, Thai |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 3 recorded warning(s) | 1 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Acetop and TeraFX against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Acetop vs TeraFX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Acetop or TeraFX?
Both Acetop and TeraFX hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Acetop maintains 4 total recorded filing(s) (CGSE, Financial Conduct Authority, SCB, Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)) with 3 warning flag(s), whereas TeraFX maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority) with 1 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Acetop and TeraFX?
In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Acetop records an Overall Score of 7.2 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 7.3, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with TeraFX at 7.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 7.9, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do Acetop and TeraFX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Acetop lists Precious metals, spread betting, contract spreads with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while TeraFX lists CFDs, Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Acetop or TeraFX?
Acetop carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 3 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while TeraFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 1 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.