1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
CF Group vs Direct TT: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CF Group (CF Group Global Ltd) and Direct TT (Direct Trading Technologies LTD) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints
Direct TT outranks CF Group by +5.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 1.5)
On supervisory breadth, CF Group holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 2 warning count(s), whereas Direct TT holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | CF Group | Direct TT | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.5 | 7.0 | +5.5 | Direct TT |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.5 | 3.0 | +1.5 | Direct TT |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 4.0 | +3.0 | Direct TT |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.5 | 6.0 | +4.5 | Direct TT |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.5 | 7.0 | +5.5 | Direct TT |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: CF Group vs Direct TT
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | CF Group | Direct TT |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | CF Group Global Ltd | Direct Trading Technologies LTD |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | -- | 76 Cannon Street, City of London, EC4N 6AE |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Stocks, fixed income, derivatives and private securities, etc. | FX (100+ currency pairs), precious metals, energy, indices, exchange-traded stocks (2, 500+ stocks and ETFs listed on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100), CFDs |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Spanish, Portuguese, Arabic, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 2 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare CF Group and Direct TT against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: CF Group vs Direct TT
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CF Group or Direct TT?
Both CF Group and Direct TT hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, CF Group maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 2 warning flag(s), whereas Direct TT maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, VFSC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CF Group and Direct TT?
In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CF Group records an Overall Score of 1.5 (Risk & Licensing: 1.5, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Direct TT at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do CF Group and Direct TT differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
CF Group lists Stocks, fixed income, derivatives and private securities, etc. with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Direct TT lists FX (100+ currency pairs), precious metals, energy, indices, exchange-traded stocks (2, 500+ stocks and ETFs listed on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100), CFDs with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CF Group or Direct TT?
CF Group carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 2 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Direct TT carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.