1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Direct TT vs ICAP: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Direct TT (Direct Trading Technologies LTD) and ICAP (TP ICAP group) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints
Direct TT outranks ICAP by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, Direct TT holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas ICAP holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Direct TT | ICAP | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.0 | 3.0 | +4.0 | Direct TT |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 2.0 | +2.0 | Direct TT |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 3.0 | +3.0 | Direct TT |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 3.0 | +4.0 | Direct TT |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Direct TT vs ICAP
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Direct TT | ICAP |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Direct Trading Technologies LTD | TP ICAP group |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 76 Cannon Street, City of London, EC4N 6AE | TP ICAP Group plc 135 Bishopsgate London United Kingdom EC2M 3TP |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX (100+ currency pairs), precious metals, energy, indices, exchange-traded stocks (2, 500+ stocks and ETFs listed on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100), CFDs | interest rates, stocks, FX, money markets, fixed income, local markets, credit, commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Spanish, Portuguese, Arabic, English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Direct TT and ICAP against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Direct TT vs ICAP
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Direct TT or ICAP?
ICAP holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, Direct TT maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, VFSC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas ICAP maintains 4 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, MAS, ASIC, CFTC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Direct TT and ICAP?
In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Direct TT records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with ICAP at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Direct TT and ICAP differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Direct TT lists FX (100+ currency pairs), precious metals, energy, indices, exchange-traded stocks (2, 500+ stocks and ETFs listed on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100), CFDs with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while ICAP lists interest rates, stocks, FX, money markets, fixed income, local markets, credit, commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Direct TT or ICAP?
Direct TT carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while ICAP carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.