Skip to content
RegTech Codex
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Equiti vs ICM: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Equiti (Equiti Brokerage (Seychelles) Limited) and ICM (ICM Capital Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: equiti-vs-icm

ICM outranks Equiti by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 6.0)

On supervisory breadth, Equiti holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 1 warning count(s), whereas ICM holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightEquitiICMScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.07.0+1.0ICM
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.07.0+1.0ICM
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.05.0+2.0ICM
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.07.0+1.0ICM
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.08.0+2.0ICM

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Equiti vs ICM

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Equiti vs ICM
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Equiti and ICM.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeEquitiICM
Primary Legal NameEquiti Brokerage (Seychelles) LimitedICM Capital Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings4 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)3 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Financial Conduct Authority: Not suppliedFinancial Services Authority Seychelles: #SD064CYSEC: #415/22SCA: Not suppliedJSC: Not supplied
Registered Domicile / AddressFirst Floor, Marina House, Eden Island Seychelles / First Floor, Marina House, Eden Island, Republic of SeychellesICM Capital Limited, Level 30, 122 Leadenhall Street, London EC3V 4AB, United Kingdom
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesFX pairs, CFDs, stock indices, energy, agricultural commodities, metalsCFDs, Commodities, Precious metals, Forex, Stocks, Futures
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4MT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Spanish, Portuguese, Arabic, Tagalog, Vietnamese, English, Korean, ThaiChinese (Simplified), Spanish, Arabic, English, Russian
Warning / Exposure Count1 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Equiti and ICM against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Equiti vs ICM

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Equiti or ICM?

Equiti holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 3). Specifically, Equiti maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Services Authority Seychelles, CYSEC, SCA) with 1 warning flag(s), whereas ICM maintains 4 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, FSRA, Labuan FSA, FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Equiti and ICM?

In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Equiti records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with ICM at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 8.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0).

How do Equiti and ICM differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Equiti lists FX pairs, CFDs, stock indices, energy, agricultural commodities, metals with execution software [MT4], while ICM lists CFDs, Commodities, Precious metals, Forex, Stocks, Futures with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Equiti or ICM?

Equiti carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 1 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while ICM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Equiti vs ICM (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | RegTech Codex