Skip to content
RegTech Codex
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Fivehills vs Kyrrex: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Fivehills (Fivehills Securities Limited) and Kyrrex (Kyrrex Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fivehills-vs-kyrrex

Fivehills outranks Kyrrex by +2.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.6)

On supervisory breadth, Fivehills holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Kyrrex holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFivehillsKyrrexScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.02.6+2.4Fivehills
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.02.6+2.4Fivehills
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.02.0+1.0Fivehills
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight4.02.6+1.4Fivehills
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.02.6+3.4Fivehills

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Fivehills vs Kyrrex

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Fivehills vs Kyrrex
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Fivehills and Kyrrex.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFivehillsKyrrex
Primary Legal NameFivehills Securities LimitedKyrrex Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address1st Floor, Dekk House, Zippora Street, Providence Industrial Estate, Mahe, SeychellesVC
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForexDigital asset trading, payments, custody and bank-grade financial solutions.
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Fivehills and Kyrrex against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Fivehills vs Kyrrex

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Fivehills or Kyrrex?

Kyrrex holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Fivehills maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Kyrrex maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (SVG FSA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Fivehills and Kyrrex?

In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Fivehills records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Kyrrex at 2.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.6, Brand: 2.6, Market Influence: 2.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).

How do Fivehills and Kyrrex differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Fivehills lists Forex with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Kyrrex lists Digital asset trading, payments, custody and bank-grade financial solutions. with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Fivehills or Kyrrex?

Fivehills carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Kyrrex carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Fivehills vs Kyrrex (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | RegTech Codex