Skip to content
RegTech Codex
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FONDEX vs Krungsri: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FONDEX (Fondex Limited) and Krungsri (Bank of Ayudhya) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fondex-vs-krungsri

FONDEX outranks Krungsri by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, FONDEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Krungsri holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFONDEXKrungsriScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.05.0+2.0FONDEX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight4.05.0+1.0Krungsri
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.03.0+1.0FONDEX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight4.05.0+1.0Krungsri
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight3.05.0+2.0Krungsri

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FONDEX vs Krungsri

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FONDEX vs Krungsri
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FONDEX and Krungsri.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFONDEXKrungsri
Primary Legal NameFondex LimitedBank of Ayudhya
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
BOT: Not supplied
Registered Domicile / AddressSC1222 Rama III Rd, Yan Nawa, Bangkok
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, EnergiesWealth management, Investment products, Deposits, Remittances, Loans, Trusts, Insurance
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), EnglishEnglish, Thai
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FONDEX and Krungsri against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FONDEX vs Krungsri

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FONDEX or Krungsri?

Krungsri holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, FONDEX maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Krungsri maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (BOT) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FONDEX and Krungsri?

In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FONDEX records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Krungsri at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do FONDEX and Krungsri differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FONDEX lists Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Energies with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Krungsri lists Wealth management, Investment products, Deposits, Remittances, Loans, Trusts, Insurance with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FONDEX or Krungsri?

FONDEX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Krungsri carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FONDEX vs Krungsri (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | RegTech Codex