Skip to content
RegTech Codex
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FONDEX vs uTrada: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FONDEX (Fondex Limited) and uTrada (uTrada Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fondex-vs-utrada

FONDEX outranks uTrada by +1.2 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 5.8)

On supervisory breadth, FONDEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas uTrada holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 1 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFONDEXuTradaScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.05.8+1.2FONDEX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight4.05.8+1.8uTrada
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.03.0+1.0FONDEX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight4.05.8+1.8uTrada
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight3.05.8+2.8uTrada

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FONDEX vs uTrada

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FONDEX vs uTrada
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FONDEX and uTrada.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFONDEXuTrada
Primary Legal NameFondex LimiteduTrada Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressSCWisma Wong Wo Lo, Lot 4A2, Suite 5, 4th Floor, Jalan Tun Mustapha, 87000 Labuan F.T Rm 7B, One Capital Place, 18 Luard Road, Wan Chai, Hong Kong. Wisma Wong Wo Lo, Lot 4A2 Suites 5, 4th Floor, Jalan Tun Mustapha, 87000 Labuan, Malaysia.
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, EnergiesIndices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)1 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FONDEX and uTrada against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FONDEX vs uTrada

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FONDEX or uTrada?

uTrada holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, FONDEX maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas uTrada maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Labuan FSA) with 1 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FONDEX and uTrada?

In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FONDEX records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with uTrada at 5.8 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.8, Brand: 5.8, Market Influence: 5.8, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do FONDEX and uTrada differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FONDEX lists Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Energies with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while uTrada lists Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FONDEX or uTrada?

FONDEX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while uTrada carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 1 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FONDEX vs uTrada (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | RegTech Codex