Skip to content
RegTech Codex
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FXOpen vs PBFX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FXOpen (FXOpen EU Ltd) and PBFX (PRIME BUSINESS CO.,LIMITED) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fxopen-vs-pbfx

FXOpen and PBFX are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 6.0)

On supervisory breadth, FXOpen holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PBFX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFXOpenPBFXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.06.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.06.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.03.0+1.0FXOpen
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.06.0+1.0PBFX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FXOpen vs PBFX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FXOpen vs PBFX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FXOpen and PBFX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFXOpenPBFX
Primary Legal NameFXOpen EU LtdPRIME BUSINESS CO.,LIMITED
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address38 Spyrou Kyprianou Street, CCS BLDG - Office N101, 4154 Limassol, CyprusGenesis Building, 5th Floor, Genesis Close, PO Box 446, Cayman Islands, KY1-1106
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCryptocurrencies, Commodities, Indices, Forex, StocksCryptocurrencies, Currency pairs, Forex, Stocks, Commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5MT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglish, German, Spanish, Portuguese, Indonesian, Italian, French, Hungarian, Arabic, Traditional ChineseChinese (Simplified), Hindi, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FXOpen and PBFX against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FXOpen vs PBFX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FXOpen or PBFX?

FXOpen holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, FXOpen maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC, CYSEC, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PBFX maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FSPR) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FXOpen and PBFX?

In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FXOpen records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with PBFX at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do FXOpen and PBFX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FXOpen lists Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Indices, Forex, Stocks with execution software [MT4, MT5], while PBFX lists Cryptocurrencies, Currency pairs, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FXOpen or PBFX?

FXOpen carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PBFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FXOpen vs PBFX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | RegTech Codex