1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FXOpen vs SONAF: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FXOpen (FXOpen EU Ltd) and SONAF (Sonaf Business Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints
FXOpen outranks SONAF by +5.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, FXOpen holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SONAF holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FXOpen | SONAF | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 1.0 | +5.0 | FXOpen |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 1.0 | +5.0 | FXOpen |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | FXOpen |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | FXOpen |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | FXOpen |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FXOpen vs SONAF
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FXOpen | SONAF |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | FXOpen EU Ltd | Sonaf Business Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 38 Spyrou Kyprianou Street, CCS BLDG - Office N101, 4154 Limassol, Cyprus | 28 Oktovriou, 319 Kanika Business Center. Flat/Office 201B, 3105, Limassol, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Indices, Forex, Stocks | Forex |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English, German, Spanish, Portuguese, Indonesian, Italian, French, Hungarian, Arabic, Traditional Chinese | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FXOpen and SONAF against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FXOpen vs SONAF
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FXOpen or SONAF?
FXOpen holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, FXOpen maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC, CYSEC, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SONAF maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FXOpen and SONAF?
In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FXOpen records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with SONAF at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do FXOpen and SONAF differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FXOpen lists Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Indices, Forex, Stocks with execution software [MT4, MT5], while SONAF lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FXOpen or SONAF?
FXOpen carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SONAF carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.