1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
iBroker vs Self Bank: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of iBroker (iBroker Global Marketssv) and Self Bank (Singular Bank, S.A.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints
iBroker and Self Bank are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, iBroker holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Self Bank holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | iBroker | Self Bank | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: iBroker vs Self Bank
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | iBroker | Self Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | iBroker Global Marketssv | Singular Bank, S.A. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | iBroker Global Markets Sociedad de Valores, SA, C. de Caleruega, 102-104, Bajo A, Cdad.Lineal, 28033 Madrid, Spain | Singular Bank, S.A.U. (Self Trade Bank S.A.U.) Calle de Goya, 11.28001 Delhi |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Spanish, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare iBroker and Self Bank against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: iBroker vs Self Bank
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: iBroker or Self Bank?
Both iBroker and Self Bank hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, iBroker maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CNMV) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Self Bank maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CNMV) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between iBroker and Self Bank?
In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), iBroker records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Self Bank at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do iBroker and Self Bank differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
iBroker lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Self Bank lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: iBroker or Self Bank?
iBroker carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Self Bank carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.