1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
IC Markets vs Pionex: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of IC Markets (IC Markets) and Pionex (Pionex) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints
IC Markets outranks Pionex by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, IC Markets holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 1 warning count(s), whereas Pionex holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | IC Markets | Pionex | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | IC Markets |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | IC Markets |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | IC Markets |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | IC Markets |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | IC Markets |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: IC Markets vs Pionex
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | IC Markets | Pionex |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | IC Markets | Pionex |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Level 4, 50 Carrington Street,Sydney, NSW 2000,Australia | 9888 W Belleview Ave Ste 2142, Denver, COLORADO |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, indices, metals, energy, soft commodities, stocks and bonds and related services financial products trading services | Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products |
| Execution Software & Terminals | ctrader-Web, ctrader-Android, ctrader-Windows, MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Indonesian, Bulgarian, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Arabic, Vietnamese, Malay, Czech, Chinese, English, French, German, Russian, Thai | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 1 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare IC Markets and Pionex against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: IC Markets vs Pionex
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: IC Markets or Pionex?
IC Markets holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, IC Markets maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC, CYSEC) with 1 warning flag(s), whereas Pionex maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (AUSTRAC, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), SEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between IC Markets and Pionex?
In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), IC Markets records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Pionex at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do IC Markets and Pionex differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
IC Markets lists FX, indices, metals, energy, soft commodities, stocks and bonds and related services financial products trading services with execution software [ctrader-Web, ctrader-Android, ctrader-Windows, MT4, MT5], while Pionex lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: IC Markets or Pionex?
IC Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 1 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Pionex carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.