Skip to content
RegTech Codex
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

M4Markets vs TRADE.COM: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of M4Markets (Harindale Ltd) and TRADE.COM (Lead Capital Global Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: m4markets-vs-trade-com

M4Markets outranks TRADE.COM by +0.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.1 vs 6.0)

On supervisory breadth, M4Markets holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 1 warning count(s), whereas TRADE.COM holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightM4MarketsTRADE.COMScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.16.0+0.1M4Markets
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.06.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.04.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.46.0+0.4M4Markets
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.06.0+1.0TRADE.COM

Visual Architecture Benchmark: M4Markets vs TRADE.COM

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: M4Markets vs TRADE.COM
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between M4Markets and TRADE.COM.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeM4MarketsTRADE.COM
Primary Legal NameHarindale LtdLead Capital Global Ltd
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings3 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressMagnum Business Center 78 Spyrou Kyprianou Avenue 3076 Limassol Cyprusat 121 Prodromou Avenue, 1st Floor, Hadjikyriakion Bldg. 1, Strovolos, Nicosia, 2064, Cyprus
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, CommoditiesForex, stocks, commodities, cryptocurrencies, indices and ETFs
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5MT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesOther regional languages, Chinese (Simplified), Vietnamese, Indonesian, English, JapaneseOther languages, Chinese (Simplified), Spanish, Portuguese, English
Warning / Exposure Count1 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare M4Markets and TRADE.COM against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: M4Markets vs TRADE.COM

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: M4Markets or TRADE.COM?

M4Markets holds more active regulated filings (3 vs 1). Specifically, M4Markets maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles, DFSA, CYSEC) with 1 warning flag(s), whereas TRADE.COM maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, FSCA, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between M4Markets and TRADE.COM?

In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), M4Markets records an Overall Score of 6.1 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.4, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with TRADE.COM at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do M4Markets and TRADE.COM differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

M4Markets lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5], while TRADE.COM lists Forex, stocks, commodities, cryptocurrencies, indices and ETFs with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: M4Markets or TRADE.COM?

M4Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 1 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while TRADE.COM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

M4Markets vs TRADE.COM (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | RegTech Codex