1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
MEX Exchange vs Trilt: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of MEX Exchange (Mex Australia Pty Ltd) and Trilt (Trilt Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints
MEX Exchange and Trilt are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (1.5 vs 1.5)
On supervisory breadth, MEX Exchange holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Trilt holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | MEX Exchange | Trilt | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: MEX Exchange vs Trilt
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | MEX Exchange | Trilt |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Mex Australia Pty Ltd | Trilt Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | MEX AUSTRALIA PTY LTD, 'Mlc Centre' Suite 03 Level 61, 19-29 Martin Place SYDNEY NSW 2000 MLC Centre, Level 61, Suite 61.03, 19 – 29 Martin Place, Sydney, NSW 2000 Australia | Omonoias 51, office 201-202,3052 Limassol, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, metals (gold and silver), CFDs | Currency pairs, CFD products |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare MEX Exchange and Trilt against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: MEX Exchange vs Trilt
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: MEX Exchange or Trilt?
Both MEX Exchange and Trilt hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, MEX Exchange maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Trilt maintains 4 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, CNMV, Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA), FSA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between MEX Exchange and Trilt?
In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), MEX Exchange records an Overall Score of 1.5 (Risk & Licensing: 1.5, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Trilt at 1.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.5, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do MEX Exchange and Trilt differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
MEX Exchange lists Forex, metals (gold and silver), CFDs with execution software [MT4], while Trilt lists Currency pairs, CFD products with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: MEX Exchange or Trilt?
MEX Exchange carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Trilt carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.