1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
OKX vs SONAF: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of OKX (OKX) and SONAF (Sonaf Business Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints
OKX outranks SONAF by +6.2 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.2 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, OKX holds 9 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 9 total filings and 1 warning count(s), whereas SONAF holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | OKX | SONAF | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.2 | 1.0 | +6.2 | OKX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.4 | 1.0 | +6.4 | OKX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 6.0 | 1.0 | +5.0 | OKX |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.8 | 1.0 | +5.8 | OKX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 2.0 | +5.0 | OKX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: OKX vs SONAF
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | OKX | SONAF |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | OKX | Sonaf Business Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 9 regulated / 9 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | MAS: Not suppliedVARA: #VL/23/12/003AUSTRAC: #22636269040MFSA: #C95813Financial Services Authority Seychelles: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1-2-10 Toranomon, Minato City, Tokyo, Japan | 28 Oktovriou, 319 Kanika Business Center. Flat/Office 201B, 3105, Limassol, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products | Forex |
| Execution Software & Terminals | OKX | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Portuguese, Arabic, Turkish, Dutch, Vietnamese, Polish, Czech, English, French, German, Russian | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 1 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare OKX and SONAF against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: OKX vs SONAF
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: OKX or SONAF?
OKX holds more active regulated filings (9 vs 0). Specifically, OKX maintains 9 total recorded filing(s) (MAS, VARA, AUSTRAC, MFSA) with 1 warning flag(s), whereas SONAF maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between OKX and SONAF?
In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), OKX records an Overall Score of 7.2 (Risk & Licensing: 7.4, Brand: 6.8, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 6.0), compared with SONAF at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do OKX and SONAF differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
OKX lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [OKX], while SONAF lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: OKX or SONAF?
OKX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 1 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SONAF carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.