1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Pacific vs SimpleFX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Pacific (Pacific Forex Asset Management) and SimpleFX (SimpleFX Ltd.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints
SimpleFX outranks Pacific by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Pacific holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 1 warning count(s), whereas SimpleFX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 1 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Pacific | SimpleFX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | SimpleFX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | SimpleFX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | SimpleFX |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | SimpleFX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 6.0 | +2.0 | SimpleFX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Pacific vs SimpleFX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Pacific | SimpleFX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Pacific Forex Asset Management | SimpleFX Ltd. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | Labuan FSA: Not supplied | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 245 Grand Street, 2nd Floor, New York, 10002, United States | Beachmont Business Centre, Suite 404, Kingstown St. Vincent and the Grenadines. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex | Cryptocurrencies, Currency pairs, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 1 recorded warning(s) | 1 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Pacific and SimpleFX against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Pacific vs SimpleFX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Pacific or SimpleFX?
Pacific holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Pacific maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Labuan FSA) with 1 warning flag(s), whereas SimpleFX maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 1 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Pacific and SimpleFX?
In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Pacific records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with SimpleFX at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Pacific and SimpleFX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Pacific lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while SimpleFX lists Cryptocurrencies, Currency pairs, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Pacific or SimpleFX?
Pacific carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 1 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SimpleFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 1 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.