1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Pionex vs Sharekhan: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Pionex (Pionex) and Sharekhan (Sharekhan) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints
Sharekhan outranks Pionex by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Pionex holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Sharekhan holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Pionex | Sharekhan | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Sharekhan |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Sharekhan |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Sharekhan |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Sharekhan |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Pionex vs Sharekhan
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Pionex | Sharekhan |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Pionex | Sharekhan |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 9888 W Belleview Ave Ste 2142, Denver, COLORADO | Sharekhan Limited, The Ruby, 18th Floor, 29 Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar (West), Mumbai 400 028, Maharashtra, India |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products | Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Stocks, Futures, Options |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Sharekhan: Demat & Trading App |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Pionex and Sharekhan against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Pionex vs Sharekhan
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Pionex or Sharekhan?
Both Pionex and Sharekhan hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Pionex maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (AUSTRAC, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), SEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Sharekhan maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (SEBI) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Pionex and Sharekhan?
In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Pionex records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Sharekhan at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Pionex and Sharekhan differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Pionex lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Sharekhan lists Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Stocks, Futures, Options with execution software [Sharekhan: Demat & Trading App]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Pionex or Sharekhan?
Pionex carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Sharekhan carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.