1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Pionex vs STAK FX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Pionex (Pionex) and STAK FX (STAK FX) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints
Pionex outranks STAK FX by +1.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 3.6)
On supervisory breadth, Pionex holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas STAK FX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Pionex | STAK FX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 3.6 | +1.4 | Pionex |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 2.3 | +2.7 | Pionex |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Pionex |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 3.8 | +1.2 | Pionex |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Pionex |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Pionex vs STAK FX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Pionex | STAK FX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Pionex | STAK FX |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 9888 W Belleview Ave Ste 2142, Denver, COLORADO | Office 101, Ifigenias 70, Strovolos 2003, Nicosia, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products | Forex, Stocks |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Pionex and STAK FX against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Pionex vs STAK FX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Pionex or STAK FX?
Pionex holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Pionex maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (AUSTRAC, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), SEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas STAK FX maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Pionex and STAK FX?
In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Pionex records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with STAK FX at 3.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.3, Brand: 3.8, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Pionex and STAK FX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Pionex lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while STAK FX lists Forex, Stocks with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Pionex or STAK FX?
Pionex carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while STAK FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.