1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Sturdy-FX vs Tradu: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Sturdy-FX (Sturdy-FX) and Tradu (First Prudential Markets Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints
Tradu outranks Sturdy-FX by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Sturdy-FX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 1 warning count(s), whereas Tradu holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Sturdy-FX | Tradu | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | Tradu |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | Tradu |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 4.0 | +3.0 | Tradu |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 6.0 | +4.0 | Tradu |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | Tradu |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Sturdy-FX vs Tradu
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Sturdy-FX | Tradu |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Sturdy-FX | First Prudential Markets Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 4229 Ringford Dr, Saint Louis, Missouri 63129 Unitied States. | 20 Gresham Street, 4th Floor, London EC2V 7JE, United Kingdom |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities | Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | FP Markets Forex & CFD Trading, MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 1 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Sturdy-FX and Tradu against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Sturdy-FX vs Tradu
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Sturdy-FX or Tradu?
Tradu holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, Sturdy-FX maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 1 warning flag(s), whereas Tradu maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Authority Seychelles, CYSEC, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Sturdy-FX and Tradu?
In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Sturdy-FX records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Tradu at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do Sturdy-FX and Tradu differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Sturdy-FX lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Tradu lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [FP Markets Forex & CFD Trading, MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Sturdy-FX or Tradu?
Sturdy-FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 1 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Tradu carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.