Skip to content
RegTech Codex
Directory

Thematic Pillar Hub · 1 Published Briefings

Regulatory Benchmarks

Regulatory Benchmarks research topics and source records from RegTech Codex. Comprehensive 2026 empirical benchmark covering 226 institutions and 342 competent authorities tracked by RegTech Codex, detailing 6D compliance scores, contracting legal entities, and direct register verification.

A named author is recorded on some briefings in this hub, including Victoria Ashworth, LL.M, CAMS . Reviewer records and automated-check status appear on each briefing when available.

Key Institutional Takeaways — Regulatory Benchmarks

  • RegTech Codex tracks 226 institutions and 342 supervisory authorities across Global AML/KYC Supervision & Enforcement Intelligence, with sampled constituents averaging 3.60/10 on the 6D Compliance Index.
  • Top-ranked benchmark constituents (led by Doo Prime at 7.0/10) maintain verifiable primary filings and clean enforcement records.
  • The 6D Quantitative Model weights Licence Standing (30%) and Risk Telemetry (25%) at 55% combined, applying immediate hard caps whenever an official regulator warning is recorded.
  • Counterparties must verify the exact contracting subsidiary and approved domain rather than relying solely on group-level brand recognition.
  • All 226 institutional profiles are cross-linked to primary regulator lookup portals, CC-BY-4.0 open datasets, and real-time REST/MCP verification endpoints.

All Regulatory Benchmarks Research Briefings (1)

Institutional Directories & Regulatory Registers

Frequently Asked Questions — Regulatory Benchmarks

How many regulated institutions does RegTech Codex audit in its 2026 Global AML/KYC Supervision & Enforcement Intelligence benchmark?

RegTech Codex currently audits 226 English-verified financial institutions across 342 competent supervisory authorities within its Global AML/KYC Supervision & Enforcement Intelligence coverage slice.

How is the 6D Compliance Score calculated on RegTech Codex?

The 6D model combines Licence Standing (30%), Risk Telemetry (25%), Institutional Scale (15%), Industry Footprint (15%), and Execution & User Signals (15%) on a 0.0–10.0 scale, as documented at /methodology.

Why can two clients of the same financial brand receive different regulatory protections?

Global brokerage and exchange groups frequently operate multiple legal subsidiaries across Tier-1 onshore regimes and offshore jurisdictions. Investor compensation, leverage limits, and client-money segregation depend strictly on the specific legal entity named in your onboarding contract.

Where can I verify an institution's licence number directly against official government records?

Every institution dossier and regulator profile on RegTech Codex links directly to the issuing authority's official public register (such as FCA FRN Register, SEC EDGAR, FINRA BrokerCheck, NFA BASIC, MAS FID, or FinCEN MSB Search).

Can AI agents and compliance scripts query RegTech Codex's benchmark data programmatically?

Yes. RegTech Codex provides public REST endpoints (/api/v1/verify/license, /api/v1/verify/domain, /api/v1/brokers/{slug}), an OpenAPI 3.1 specification (/.well-known/openapi.json), and a JSON-RPC 2.0 MCP server (/api/mcp).

Explore Related Thematic Research Hubs on RegTech Codex

Regulatory Benchmarks — Institutional Research & Regulatory Hub | RegTech Codex