Skip to content
RegTech Codex
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

AMP Global vs SCDEX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of AMP Global (AMP Global) and SCDEX (SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: amp-global-vs-scdex

SCDEX outranks AMP Global by +4.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (9.3 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, AMP Global holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SCDEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightAMP GlobalSCDEXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.09.3+4.3SCDEX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight4.09.5+5.5SCDEX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.09.3+6.3SCDEX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.09.2+9.2SCDEX
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight4.09.4+5.4SCDEX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight4.09.1+5.1SCDEX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: AMP Global vs SCDEX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: AMP Global vs SCDEX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between AMP Global and SCDEX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeAMP GlobalSCDEX
Primary Legal NameAMP GlobalSCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedLow risk
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressAyiou Athanasiou Avenue, Kaminion Street 1, 2nd floor, 4100, Agios Athanasios, Limassol1312 17th Street Suite 692, Denver, COLORADO 80202
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCryptocurrencies, CFDs, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Metals, EnergiesCrypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformSCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), EnglishEnglish, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Vietnamese, Thai
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare AMP Global and SCDEX against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: AMP Global vs SCDEX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: AMP Global or SCDEX?

Both AMP Global and SCDEX hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, AMP Global maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (NFA, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SCDEX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (NFA, FinCEN) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between AMP Global and SCDEX?

In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), AMP Global records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with SCDEX at 9.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 9.5, Brand: 9.4, Market Influence: 9.1, User Reputation: 9.2, Execution & Software: 9.3).

How do AMP Global and SCDEX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

AMP Global lists Cryptocurrencies, CFDs, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Metals, Energies with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while SCDEX lists Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances with execution software [SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: AMP Global or SCDEX?

AMP Global carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SCDEX carries a "Low risk" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

AMP Global vs SCDEX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | RegTech Codex