1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
SCDEX vs Trilt: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of SCDEX (SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE) and Trilt (Trilt Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints
SCDEX outranks Trilt by +7.8 pts in composite 6D scoring (9.3 vs 1.5)
On supervisory breadth, SCDEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Trilt holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | SCDEX | Trilt | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 9.3 | 1.5 | +7.8 | SCDEX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 9.5 | 1.5 | +8.0 | SCDEX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 9.3 | 1.0 | +8.3 | SCDEX |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 9.2 | 0.0 | +9.2 | SCDEX |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 9.4 | 1.5 | +7.9 | SCDEX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 9.1 | 1.5 | +7.6 | SCDEX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: SCDEX vs Trilt
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | SCDEX | Trilt |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE | Trilt Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Low risk | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1312 17th Street Suite 692, Denver, COLORADO 80202 | Omonoias 51, office 201-202,3052 Limassol, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances | Currency pairs, CFD products |
| Execution Software & Terminals | SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Vietnamese, Thai | Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare SCDEX and Trilt against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: SCDEX vs Trilt
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: SCDEX or Trilt?
Both SCDEX and Trilt hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, SCDEX maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (NFA, FinCEN) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Trilt maintains 4 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, CNMV, Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA), FSA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between SCDEX and Trilt?
In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), SCDEX records an Overall Score of 9.3 (Risk & Licensing: 9.5, Brand: 9.4, Market Influence: 9.1, User Reputation: 9.2, Execution & Software: 9.3), compared with Trilt at 1.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.5, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do SCDEX and Trilt differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
SCDEX lists Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances with execution software [SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine], while Trilt lists Currency pairs, CFD products with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: SCDEX or Trilt?
SCDEX carries a "Low risk" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Trilt carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.