1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Exness vs STAK FX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Exness (Exness Europe Limited) and STAK FX (STAK FX) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints
Exness outranks STAK FX by +3.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.3 vs 3.6)
On supervisory breadth, Exness holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 1 warning count(s), whereas STAK FX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Exness | STAK FX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.3 | 3.6 | +3.7 | Exness |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.6 | 2.3 | +5.3 | Exness |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Exness |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.1 | 3.8 | +3.3 | Exness |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.8 | 3.0 | +3.8 | Exness |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Exness vs STAK FX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Exness | STAK FX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Exness Europe Limited | STAK FX |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 4 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | F20, 1st Floor, Eden Plaza, Eden Island, Seychelles; Emancipatie Boulevard Dominico F. “Don” Martina 31, Curaçao; Trinity Chambers, P.O. Box 4301, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands; Siafi Street, Portobello, Office 401, 3042, Limassol, Cyprus. | Office 101, Ifigenias 70, Strovolos 2003, Nicosia, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, commodities, digital assets, stocks, indices and related services CFD trading services | Forex, Stocks |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | Spanish, Portuguese, Arabic, Urdu, Bengali, Vietnamese, Indonesian, Hindi, Chinese, English, Japanese, Korean, French, Russian, Thai | Chinese, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 1 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Exness and STAK FX against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Exness vs STAK FX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Exness or STAK FX?
Exness holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 0). Specifically, Exness maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (FSCA, CYSEC, Financial Services Commission, Mauritius, Financial Conduct Authority) with 1 warning flag(s), whereas STAK FX maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Exness and STAK FX?
In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Exness records an Overall Score of 7.3 (Risk & Licensing: 7.6, Brand: 7.1, Market Influence: 6.8, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with STAK FX at 3.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.3, Brand: 3.8, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Exness and STAK FX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Exness lists FX, commodities, digital assets, stocks, indices and related services CFD trading services with execution software [MT4, MT5], while STAK FX lists Forex, Stocks with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Exness or STAK FX?
Exness carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 1 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while STAK FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.