Skip to content
RegTech Codex
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FXOpen vs MEX Exchange: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FXOpen (FXOpen EU Ltd) and MEX Exchange (Mex Australia Pty Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fxopen-vs-mex-exchange

FXOpen outranks MEX Exchange by +4.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 1.5)

On supervisory breadth, FXOpen holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MEX Exchange holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFXOpenMEX ExchangeScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.01.5+4.5FXOpen
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.01.5+4.5FXOpen
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.01.0+3.0FXOpen
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.01.5+3.5FXOpen
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.01.5+3.5FXOpen

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FXOpen vs MEX Exchange

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FXOpen vs MEX Exchange
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FXOpen and MEX Exchange.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFXOpenMEX Exchange
Primary Legal NameFXOpen EU LtdMex Australia Pty Ltd
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address38 Spyrou Kyprianou Street, CCS BLDG - Office N101, 4154 Limassol, CyprusMEX AUSTRALIA PTY LTD, 'Mlc Centre' Suite 03 Level 61, 19-29 Martin Place SYDNEY NSW 2000 MLC Centre, Level 61, Suite 61.03, 19 – 29 Martin Place, Sydney, NSW 2000 Australia
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCryptocurrencies, Commodities, Indices, Forex, StocksForex, metals (gold and silver), CFDs
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5MT4
Supported Client LanguagesEnglish, German, Spanish, Portuguese, Indonesian, Italian, French, Hungarian, Arabic, Traditional ChineseEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FXOpen and MEX Exchange against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FXOpen vs MEX Exchange

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FXOpen or MEX Exchange?

FXOpen holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, FXOpen maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC, CYSEC, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MEX Exchange maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FXOpen and MEX Exchange?

In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FXOpen records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with MEX Exchange at 1.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.5, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do FXOpen and MEX Exchange differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FXOpen lists Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Indices, Forex, Stocks with execution software [MT4, MT5], while MEX Exchange lists Forex, metals (gold and silver), CFDs with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FXOpen or MEX Exchange?

FXOpen carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MEX Exchange carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FXOpen vs MEX Exchange (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | RegTech Codex