Skip to content
RegTech Codex
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FXOpen vs STAK FX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FXOpen (FXOpen EU Ltd) and STAK FX (STAK FX) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fxopen-vs-stak-fx

FXOpen outranks STAK FX by +2.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 3.6)

On supervisory breadth, FXOpen holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas STAK FX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFXOpenSTAK FXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.03.6+2.4FXOpen
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.02.3+3.7FXOpen
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.02.0+2.0FXOpen
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.03.8+1.2FXOpen
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.03.0+2.0FXOpen

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FXOpen vs STAK FX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FXOpen vs STAK FX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FXOpen and STAK FX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFXOpenSTAK FX
Primary Legal NameFXOpen EU LtdSTAK FX
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address38 Spyrou Kyprianou Street, CCS BLDG - Office N101, 4154 Limassol, CyprusOffice 101, Ifigenias 70, Strovolos 2003, Nicosia, Cyprus
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCryptocurrencies, Commodities, Indices, Forex, StocksForex, Stocks
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5MT4
Supported Client LanguagesEnglish, German, Spanish, Portuguese, Indonesian, Italian, French, Hungarian, Arabic, Traditional ChineseChinese, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FXOpen and STAK FX against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FXOpen vs STAK FX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FXOpen or STAK FX?

FXOpen holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, FXOpen maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC, CYSEC, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas STAK FX maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FXOpen and STAK FX?

In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FXOpen records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with STAK FX at 3.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.3, Brand: 3.8, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).

How do FXOpen and STAK FX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FXOpen lists Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Indices, Forex, Stocks with execution software [MT4, MT5], while STAK FX lists Forex, Stocks with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FXOpen or STAK FX?

FXOpen carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while STAK FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FXOpen vs STAK FX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | RegTech Codex