1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
IC Markets vs Octa: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of IC Markets (IC Markets) and Octa (Octa Markets Cyprus Ltd.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints
IC Markets outranks Octa by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 6.0)
On supervisory breadth, IC Markets holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 1 warning count(s), whereas Octa holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 1 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | IC Markets | Octa | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | IC Markets |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | IC Markets |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | IC Markets |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | IC Markets |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | IC Markets |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: IC Markets vs Octa
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | IC Markets | Octa |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | IC Markets | Octa Markets Cyprus Ltd. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Level 4, 50 Carrington Street,Sydney, NSW 2000,Australia | 1, Agias Zonis and Thessalonikis Corner, Nicolaou Pentadromos Center, Block: B', Office: 201, 3026, Limassol, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, indices, metals, energy, soft commodities, stocks and bonds and related services financial products trading services | Trading services, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | ctrader-Web, ctrader-Android, ctrader-Windows, MT4, MT5 | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | Indonesian, Bulgarian, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Arabic, Vietnamese, Malay, Czech, Chinese, English, French, German, Russian, Thai | Chinese (Simplified), Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Bengali, Vietnamese, Indonesian, Malay, Hindi, English, German, Thai |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 1 recorded warning(s) | 1 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare IC Markets and Octa against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: IC Markets vs Octa
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: IC Markets or Octa?
Both IC Markets and Octa hold 2 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, IC Markets maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC, CYSEC) with 1 warning flag(s), whereas Octa maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI)) with 1 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between IC Markets and Octa?
In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), IC Markets records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Octa at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do IC Markets and Octa differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
IC Markets lists FX, indices, metals, energy, soft commodities, stocks and bonds and related services financial products trading services with execution software [ctrader-Web, ctrader-Android, ctrader-Windows, MT4, MT5], while Octa lists Trading services, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: IC Markets or Octa?
IC Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 1 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Octa carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 1 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.