1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Interactive Investor vs Trilt: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Interactive Investor (Interactive Investor Services Limited) and Trilt (Trilt Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints
Interactive Investor outranks Trilt by +3.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.5)
On supervisory breadth, Interactive Investor holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Trilt holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Interactive Investor | Trilt | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 1.5 | +3.5 | Interactive Investor |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 1.5 | +3.5 | Interactive Investor |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | Interactive Investor |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 1.5 | +2.5 | Interactive Investor |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.5 | +3.5 | Interactive Investor |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Interactive Investor vs Trilt
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Interactive Investor | Trilt |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Interactive Investor Services Limited | Trilt Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 201 Deansgate Manchester M3 3NWM 3 3 N W UNITED KINGDOM | Omonoias 51, office 201-202,3052 Limassol, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Stocks, Funds, Trusts and ETFs | Currency pairs, CFD products |
| Execution Software & Terminals | interactive investor (ii) | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Interactive Investor and Trilt against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Interactive Investor vs Trilt
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Interactive Investor or Trilt?
Both Interactive Investor and Trilt hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Interactive Investor maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Trilt maintains 4 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, CNMV, Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA), FSA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Interactive Investor and Trilt?
In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Interactive Investor records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Trilt at 1.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.5, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Interactive Investor and Trilt differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Interactive Investor lists Stocks, Funds, Trusts and ETFs with execution software [interactive investor (ii)], while Trilt lists Currency pairs, CFD products with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Interactive Investor or Trilt?
Interactive Investor carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Trilt carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.