1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
STAK FX vs TBC: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of STAK FX (STAK FX) and TBC (TREASURE BAY CAPITAL PTY LTD) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints
TBC outranks STAK FX by +0.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (4.0 vs 3.6)
On supervisory breadth, STAK FX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas TBC holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | STAK FX | TBC | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.6 | 4.0 | +0.4 | TBC |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.3 | 4.0 | +1.7 | TBC |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | TBC |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.8 | 4.0 | +0.2 | TBC |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | TBC |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: STAK FX vs TBC
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | STAK FX | TBC |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | STAK FX | TREASURE BAY CAPITAL PTY LTD |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Office 101, Ifigenias 70, Strovolos 2003, Nicosia, Cyprus | Vistra Corporate Services Centre, Suite 23, 1st Floor, Eden Plaza, Eden Island, Mahe, Republic of Seychelles。 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, Stocks | FX and CFDs trading |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese, English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare STAK FX and TBC against other regulated peers in our firms with licence warnings, enforcement flags or complaints slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: STAK FX vs TBC
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: STAK FX or TBC?
Both STAK FX and TBC hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, STAK FX maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas TBC maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between STAK FX and TBC?
In RegTech Codex's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), STAK FX records an Overall Score of 3.6 (Risk & Licensing: 2.3, Brand: 3.8, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with TBC at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do STAK FX and TBC differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
STAK FX lists Forex, Stocks with execution software [MT4], while TBC lists FX and CFDs trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: STAK FX or TBC?
STAK FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while TBC carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.